PKP and its Digital Humanities "Readership"

PKP Scholarly Publishing Conference
12 July 2007
1:45-2:45 SFUHC Canfor Policy Room

Presenters:

Speaker:

Cara Leitch, PhD Candidate, University of Victoria.
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

Ray Siemens, University of Victoria.
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

John Willinsky, University of British Columbia.
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Karin Armstrong, ETCL Administrator, University of Victoria.
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

Abstract

"It May Change My Understanding of the Field" New Reading Tools for the Scholars

Caroline Leitch spoke on the outcomes of a project to evaluate reading tools for scholars in the humanities. Each participant in a study of scholars at the University of Victoria and the University of British Columbia selected an article from an OJS source and answered a question set developed by Leitch and her colleagues. The reading tools available for scholars to make use of through OJS works are designed to:

• Evaluate and place the author's work within a larger field
• Gain a better understanding of that field through contextual material
• Locate research material
• Access material that readers already have

Reputation played an important role in respondents reaction to on-line reading tools. While some scholars were skeptical of on-line resources that were not peer-reviewed or traceable to an established institution, the peer-reviewed OJS sources were noted as providing:

• Up-to-date information
• An informal atmosphere
• A sense of community and dialogue

The opportunity to read "cutting edge insight" of scholars involved in the discipline through OJS comments or forums allows for access this up-to-date information instead of relying on the scholars last formally published work.

A key aspect that participants in the study noted was the two-tiered access to information based on institutional and geographic location. The free databases available to academics at their universities or homes via proxy are not as complete as those databases available to non-academics or those researchers who are traveling. The development of a framework that enables readers to access their own reading tools from within whatever reading network they might be using would address some of the geographic disparity.

The benefits identified through the study include:

• Supporting online research
• Augmenting existing tools (providing greater context without replace existing tools)
• Increasing the understanding and engagement in both experts and non-expert reader
  

The reading tools are a valuable resource for connecting ideas and people.

Commentary

One of the terms Leitch used in her was “folksonomy” – an individual’s ability to create his or her own tags and labels as a way of organizing data (see Adam Mathes essay for a discussion of folksonomies). Leitch revealed that users of the OJS articles wanted to be able to input their own search terms without being limited by the parameters of others.

The ability to create a reading environment that is particular to the individual must be balanced with the need to create a platform that multiple users can communicate across an established common ground. Participants in the study noted the importance of discipline-relevant search terms that can set helpful organizational boundaries when sorting through data.

Who sets the tags for an article then becomes an important aspect of on-line publishing. Authors and editors may select particular tags that classify an article a certain way, but these discipline-specific terms may be unknown or confusing for the reader who has an interest in the subject without having a scholarly background in common with the creator of categorizer of the work. The editor with the task of publishing past issues of print articles on-line may be a generation or more removed from the author and the terminology of the creator’s time.

Making scholarly work available via OA not only means increasing the circulation of knowledge, it also transmits information to an audience that might never have been imagined with a print publication. Tags should not be designed to “down-dumb” information for a lay reader, but include labels that open up the scholarly ground and invite people from a variety of backgrounds who can make use of and contribute to development of knowledge.

Links:

Learn more about the OJS Reading Tools.

Other sessions involving these presenters: Professional Reading Environments and Online and Print Journals through XML.

Read about the Electronic Textual Cultures Laboratory at the University of Victoria.

Librarians as campus OA leaders: the University of Alberta experience

PKP Scholarly Publishing Conference
12 July 2007
9:40-10:40 SFUHC Sauder Industries Policy Room

Presenters:
Pam Ryan, University of Alberta Libraries.
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
CV and Personal Website

Denise Koufogiannakis, University of Alberta Libraries.
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
CV

Denise Koufogiannakis

Abstract

Denise Koufogiannkis and Pam Ryan provided an overview of their experience with Open Access (OA) at the University of Alberta (U of A). Making the transition from OA in theory to OA in practice in the university and public settings were key issues discussed in this presentation. Koufogiannkis noted that the U of A library is working to raise awareness of OA not only on campus, but to library users in other settings including the public education and public library system. To this end, Koufogiannkis developed a OA mandate for the U of A library that stresses the importance of including OA products in the library collection and providing support for the U of A community who have an interest in OA formats.

Building on discussions that began in 2006 and working with faculty via liaison librarians to explain the benefits of OA has seen the U of A librarians take a proactive approach. As editors of Evidence Based Library Information Practice Koufogiannkis and Ryan can provide insight into the practice of managing and using an OA journal. With regular meetings between faculty and librarians and promoting high profile events on campus (including the March 2007 lecture by Dr. John Willinsky on OA Principles) keeping OA in the campus and public eye has been an important part of moving OA forward.

Looking to the future, the recent hiring of a digital repository librarian and the commitment to further developing the presentation options of OA resources is further solidifying the importance of OA to the campus community and the academic library at the U of A. To continue to meet the needs of OA users, Ryan noted that librarians can be leaders by working with faculty to determine their needs by developing locally based solutions.

While neither Koufogiannkis or Ryan have "OA facilitator" in their job descriptions, both librarians look at OA as the future of libraries and have committed to serving the U of A community; students, faculty, staff, and members of public who have an interest in OA products, research, and information.

Connecting to and communicating with other librarians as OA becomes more popular has also lead to the creation of the Facebook group: Librarians who support open access.

Question from audience:
Could the presenters comment on the relationship between librarians and faculty?
-Faculty and librarians come from different perspectives, but value each other in research and knowledge. Librarians can inform and assist faculty with the advances of the OA process, but Ryan noted that having a high profile member of the academic community -- like John Willinsky -- talk about OA and its advantages to U of A faculty was of great benefit.

Commentary

Pam Ryan noted that discussing OA products is like being on a “carousel of progress”. Librarians find themselves explaining all aspects of OA to interested parties and informing faculty members of the public benefit – going around the same issues over and again until there is an understanding amongst the campus community. With the U of A’s enthusiasm for OA and OJS, the possibilities appear great. However, Ryan also explained that while librarians are excited to work with journals in the start-up phase and can offer support through the initial set-up, the software support is not available locally.

Will on-line journals develop faster and require more elements than the current software allows? As OJS develops new reading tools and seeks to provide the most effective access to information, improvements in the system are bound to occur. However, in his keynote address at the PKP Conference, John Willinsky reported that of 1000 journals using OJS since 2002, 46% are still using the original system. The software itself is clearly not holding back the transmission of ideas to an ever increasing audience.

Once enough members of an academic community support OA products there can be a movement from a “carousel of progress” where a network of people focuses on the journal service to the transmission of scholarly ideas across that group that includes scientists, doctors, social scientists, and researchers in the humanities.

Links to:

University of Alberta Library Homepage

Open Access Publishing Information for the U of A